The anti-Mormons & the Trinity – Part 1



The purpose of this post, and the next few, is to enlighten and expose the falsehoods perpetrated by the many anti-Mormons that have found new life now that a Mormon is running for President of the United States. But the primary cause for alarm among these anti-Mormons is not Mitt Romney running for President, but the LDS Church’s steady growth through the years. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, as viewed by many of the anti-Mormons, is the new kid on the block, yet the LDS Church has been experiencing constant and steady growth. Since many of the LDS converts come from Evangelical or other Christian backgrounds, the leaders of these denominations not only feel threatened , but they are losing parishioners and with the parishioners, money. That is the real threat to the anti-Mormons. If it was really about converting people to Christ, these anti-Mormons would be called anti-Islams, anti-Jewish, or anti-Hindu.
Anti-Mormons have chosen a negative approach to proselytizing and converting others by attacking the beliefs of others. They do not preach what they believe, but what they do not believe.

This brings us to the Trinity. Interestingly, the word “trinity” is found nowhere in the Bible. The doctrine of the Trinity is not found in scripture, but appeared shorty after the Nicene Creed. The following is taken from here, and those who want to learn more about the early church, will find the Nicene Creed quite interesting:

http://www.creeds.net/ancient/Nicene_Intro.htm

NICENE CREED – Historical Note

In the first three centuries, the church found itself in a hostile environment. On the one hand, it grappled with the challenge of relating the language of the gospel, developed in a Hebraic and Jewish-Christian context, to a Graeco-Roman world. On the other hand, it was threatened not only by persecution, but also by ideas that were in conflict with the biblical witness.

In A.D. 312, Constantine won control of the Roman Empire in the battle of Milvian Bridge. Attributing his victory to the intervention of Jesus Christ, he elevated Christianity to favored status in the empire. “One God, one Lord, one faith, one church, one empire, one emperor” became his motto.

The new emperor soon discovered that “one faith and one church” were fractured by theological disputes, especially conflicting understandings of the nature of Christ, long a point of controversy. Arius, a priest of the church in Alexandria, asserted that the divine Christ, the Word through whom all things have their existence, was created by God before the beginning of time. Therefore, the divinity of Christ was similar to the divinity of God, but not of the same essence. Arius was opposed by the bishop, Alexander, together with his associate and successor, Athanasius. They affirmed that the divinity of Christ, the Son, is of the same substance as the divinity of God, the Father. To hold otherwise, they said, was to open the possibility of polytheism, and to imply that knowledge of God in Christ was not final knowledge of God.

To counter a widening rift within the church, Constantine convened a council in Nicaea in A.D. 325. A creed reflecting the position of Alexander and Athanasius was written and signed by a majority of the bishops. Nevertheless, the two parties continued to battle each other. In A.D. 381, a second council met in Constantinople. It adopted a revised and expanded form of the A.D. 325 creed, now known as the Nicene Creed.

The Nicene Creed is the most ecumenical of creeds. The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) joins with Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and most Protestant churches in affirming it.

It certainly appears that the Trinity concept appeared here, since it cannot be found anywhere in the Bible. Even way back then, the nature of Christ was a controversy.

The anti-Mormons will use predominately the following scriptures to support their concept of the Trinity:

Isaiah 44:6; John 10:30; 1 John 5:7; John 14:5-9

The anti-Mormons adhere literally to these scriptures, but will not accept a literal interpretation of a scripture when it does not fit their needs. And there are a ton of those scriptures that the anti-Mormons won’t even discuss.

For example, John 10:30 says “I and my Father are one”. The anti-Mormons state that this must be taken literally, as one essence. But a problem arises in the same gospel of John 17:11, when the Jesus “part” of God prays to the Father “part” of God. The anti-Mormons want us to actually believe that God actually prays to himself!

Another example. In Matthew 24:36 and Mark 13:32, Jesus Christ spoke of His coming in glory. He said, “that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.” Using the anti-Mormon belief in the Trinity and the all – in – one – God theory, then I have to believe that the anti-Mormon God is not a truthful God……being the same God as the Father, Jesus had to know the timing of His second coming. Sorry anti-Mormons, but my God is not a liar and He is not the Father in essence, being, person, substance, or anything else.

This is such an interesting subject that I will continue with it tomorrow. IMHO

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s